January 20, 2024

Presidential Time Travel

If history repeated itself one hundred years later, would anyone even notice?

In a strange episode of art imitating life, the tale of Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy is rather peculiar, to say the least.

Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy were two high-profile American presidents who served the nation during critical periods in US history. While they lived in different centuries and faced very different challenges, they also shared some staggering similarities, or maybe better put: an eye-watering set of coincidences that beggar belief.

Brace yourself because what you're about to see will be difficult to fathom.

First impressions count

Abraham Lincoln served as the 16th president from 1861 to 1865, leading the US during the nation's Civil War. Kennedy, the 35th president, served from 1961 until his assassination in 1963, during the height of the Cold War and the civil rights movement.

Perhaps the most striking parallel between Lincoln and Kennedy is their tragic fate. Both presidents were assassinated while in office. Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth on 14 April 1865, and Kennedy was shot in Dallas, Texas, on 22 November 1963, by Lee Harvey Oswald.

Lincoln and Kennedy both faced significant challenges during their presidencies. Lincoln confronted the nation's division during the Civil War, aiming to preserve the Union. Kennedy navigated the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, a tense standoff with the Soviet Union that pushed two superpowers close to nuclear war.

Coincidences collide

As the table below shows, the striking similarities between these two leading lights of US political history range from eyebrow-raising, all the way through to jaw-dropping.

Judge for yourself...


Interestingly, the coincidences are eerily precise and entirely symmetrical, specifically the exact 100-year blip for many of the dated differences including dates of ascension to a political post, or dates of birth for the characters involved.

Reaction, problem, solution

The first reaction to reading through that extensive list of factoids is typically one of the following: a)it's just coincidence b)there's no way all of those facts are true, or c)how on Earth is that possible?

Remember that each of these "coincidences" is absolutely true as far as the history books have recorded events covering these two US political kingpins.

Regardless of one's disposition to chance and probability, it is simply impossible for so many coincidences to happen at the same time. Not unless there's been divine providence, or, more likely, some mischievous men tweaking historical narratives and scholarly consensus.

It is the equivalent of playing roulette and seeing the ball end on Zero on two tables twenty times in a row. The game is clearly rigged.

In the case of the two illustrious Presidents, it's not so much that all those events were meticulously planned so they all lined up perfectly for the photo finish. Far from it.

The architects of this historical déjà vu simply invented plot devices and scripted character profiles to purposefully create symmetry. It was not random chance or unintended coincidence, or the Divine Hand -- it was merely men with great positions of power and influence using their abilities to put their stamp on history.

Historical double take

As avid (and honest) students of history will realise, how President Kennedy was shot and killed has been covered up and misrepresented by people still unknown. The incident has become one of the world's most discussed events, bringing forth all sorts of potential explanations including organised crime involvement, foreign state intervention, or, most likely, deep US state involvement including nefarious secret agents hellbent on framing a patsy by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald. 

It would seem that as part of the "framing" process, an entirely fabricated backstory was created including symmetrical details reflecting Abraham Lincoln's killer 100 years prior.

The really intriguing revelation of the presidential symmetries is that whoever planned the Kennedy assassination, would have had to know and begin to plan for it, around the year 1946 -- the year Kennedy was elected to the US Congress. This was the earliest synchrony between the two Presidents and would have likely meant that the perpetrators ensured Kennedy's path to his presidency (not only his final demise).

Using some basic abduction suggests Kennedy's fate and how it would interweave with Lincoln's, including the assassination in 1963, was planned around 17 years beforehand.

Grandiose recknonings

Once the connotations of what's been presented have been fully absorbed and understood, the ultimate question can't help but linger in the air: why would someone work so hard to make this happen?

The tasks must have included inventing forensic evidence, faking witness statements, fabricating profiles, inserting misleading backstories and falsifying records to present Kennedy as a replica of Lincoln who had died in such circumstances 100 years prior.

Why would someone want to create a mirror image and run the risk of all of this becoming a bit too obvious for the watching public?
The answer seems to lie in the fact that our known world and all its societies are being controlled by dark occult elites who work from the shadows by instructing the world's Presidents and political figures to carry out their bidding. Despite how conspiratorial this may sound, plenty of people in the past have forewarned the world of this menacing force manipulating the world.

The likes of George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Bertrand Russell, Ray Bradbury, Franz Kafka and Hermann Hesse have all written about the authoritarian manipulation poisoning the world, using techniques such as propaganda, mass media, public schooling and imperialism to mislead millions of people.

Another author, Edward Bernays, wrote at length about nefarious forces controlling society from the shadows. Here is an excerpt from his book 'Propaganda', published in 1928:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. 

We are governed, our minds are moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet. 

They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure. Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons — a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million — who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world."

Evidently, John Kennedy's fate was sealed sometime in the mid-1940s when a plan was made to mimic his life to that of Abraham Lincoln, including his ultimate demise. 

But the reason why, in the simplest terms, was because elitist operatives, as part of an occult government, were contriving to control the public mind.

Megalomanic elites decided they would use the life and death of an existing US President to traumatise millions of Americans into accepting sinister ideas such as collectivism, pacifism, nationalism and socialism. Once accepted, these ideas would mould their minds and transform their conscience so that, ultimately, millions of infantilised adults continue living a life of blissfully ignorant servitude without ever suspecting foul play.



Written by George Tchetvertakov