Biblical believers were either wrong then, or they're wrong now.
The story of the Bible is an illustriously infamous one.Truth-seeking
Geocentric legacy
In other words,
people from the ancient past were all geostationary geocentrists and were proud
of it. The world made sense to them. Their approximation of the world,
including their model of reality, helped them build large stone structures that
stand to this day.
So what happened?
Why do today's Abrahamics believe in a heliocentric system? Wouldn't that
necessarily mean their highly esteemed leading lights were wrong all those
years ago? If that's the case, then it means prophets can make mistakes.
The notion that
God's prophets could have been wrong about their conceptions of reality is
rather unpalatable to Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike; however, so is the
notion that modern society, including its scientific consensus, has been fooled
into thinking the Earth is a globe.
So what gives?
The Unthinkable
If it's the case
that we live in a geocentric system, then the prophets of yesteryear were
correct!
But if that's the case, it means most Abrahamic believers are wrong today. Most of them have taken to Science like ducks to water. They haven't accepted all scientific theories as fact, merely those supporting their biblical narrative. Therefore, all Jews, Christians and Muslims, as challenging as it is, must ask themselves the following questions: were the prophets wrong then? Or is society wrong now?
One of those two
options is necessarily true. But whichever option they choose will lead to very
uncomfortable connotations.
If they believe
people in the past were wrong -- then it means Abrahamic prophets are
fallible and may have got many things completely wrong, as well as all the
scriptures they promoted.
If they believe the
people of today are wrong, including the scientific consensus -- then it means
the entire world has been duped into believing false paradigms within the
Natural Sciences, namely physics, geology, astrology/astronomy and cosmology.
It would mean
reality as we know it is close to what's described in George Orwell's book
1984: a dystopic world where its inhabitants are misled about all aspects of
reality for them to be easily controlled.
The salve of salvation
For religious
people, the dilemma is hugely problematic.
Given that they
take their view of reality on faith, they are torn between believing in ancient
ideas that directly contradict modern atheistic theories. They either have to
go with the contemporary crowd of atheists and thereby lose their religiosity
or keep their religiosity and become geocentric flat-earthers.
Either option is
daunting, especially in a world with so much ridicule for the geocentric view.
As a result, many Abrahamics are trying to forge a third path: believing that
atheistic concepts such as evolution and abiogenesis were actually designed and
actuated by God.
Despite these ideas
being mutually exclusive, religious people in the modern day are absolving
themselves from their philosophical fallaciousness by groupthinking their way
to self-security. Research conducted by Solomon Asch in the 1950s demonstrates this issue well.
In other words,
they ignore valid scepticism and critique and remain in a trance of belief
among their cohorts. This should be called out for what it is, and many words
come to mind: conformity, groupthink, cultism, brainwashing, echo chamber,
circle-jerk and hive-mind, to name but a few.
Written by George Tchetvertakov